CONTENTS

 
   about
   MICHAEL BETANCOURT NEWS
   movies: AESTHETICS
   movies: NEWS & REVIEWS
   movies: SHOWS & SCREENINGS
   random art notes
   random how-tos
   research: AVANT-GARDE MOVIES
   research: MOTION GRAPHICS
   research: VISUAL MUSIC
   theory: CRITICAL OBSERVATIONS
   theory: DIGITAL CAPITALISM
   theory: GLITCH & POSTDIGITAL
   theory: working notes

 

SOCIAL

 
Instagram
 
LinkedIn Profile
 
The Visual Music Village


PORTFOLIO

 
Movies by Michael Betancourt

 michaelbetancourt.com
 Going Somewhere
 exhibitions [pdf]
 updates
 books
 contact

 




 

SEARCH ARCHIVES

archives begin in 1996

  
Smilies and Typography

story © Michael Betancourt | published March 17, 2011 | permalink | TwitThis Digg Facebook StumbleUpon  |  



movies: AESTHETICS

Increasingly the conversion of smilies into cute little graphics by various software programs is looking juvenile, like an incorrect solution to what is clearly a problem based in punctuation. Consider the way that punctuation is essential to the creation of meaning in this singular statement:

Wow, that's great.
Wow, that's great!
Wow, that's great :)
Wow, that's great :(
Wow, that's great ;)
Wow, that's great :(
In each case there is an entirely distinct, independent meaning conveyed; however, the four basic smilies are, in purely typographic terms, awkward. Yet the conversion of them into little graphic faces does little to resolve this issue. Instead, it forces a shift from reading into looking--language to picture--that disrupts the comfortable flow of scansion.

What we need, perhaps, are some new typographic characters based on the letter forms that create the smilies, nicely kerned, which can then be inserted as we would any other element of punctuation. I know this would have a direct and immediate impact on how I would use these elements in my own writing.






 
 

 
 
  • more from movies: AESTHETICS

  •  
     
  • print

  •