CONTENTS

 
   about
   MICHAEL BETANCOURT NEWS
   movies: AESTHETICS
   movies: NEWS & REVIEWS
   movies: SHOWS & SCREENINGS
   random art notes
   random how-tos
   research: AVANT-GARDE MOVIES
   research: MOTION GRAPHICS
   research: VISUAL MUSIC
   theory: CRITICAL OBSERVATIONS
   theory: DIGITAL CAPITALISM
   theory: GLITCH & POSTDIGITAL
   theory: working notes

 

SOCIAL

 
Facebook Fanpage
 
Twitter
 
LinkedIn Profile


PORTFOLIO

 
Movies by Michael Betancourt

 michaelbetancourt.com
 exhibitions [pdf]
 updates
 books
 contact

 




 

SEARCH ARCHIVES

archives begin in 1996

  
A News Photo from Occupy Wall Street

story © Michael Betancourt | published October 16, 2011 | permalink | TwitThis Digg Facebook StumbleUpon  |  



theory: CRITICAL OBSERVATIONS

A news photo shot by AP photographer Mary Altaffer showing a New York City police officer running over a Legal Aid Society observer as Occupy Wall Street demonstrators march through the streets near Wall Street on Friday, October 14, 2011 is a very interesting depiction of these events:



This image offers an encapsulation of the role that the media have in these events, and how important media coverage is for both sides of these protests: depending on how this picture is framed in a discussion, it is possible to create an entirely different story:

In one, it is the "protester" who is at fault, whose actions are a result of attempting to disrupt the proper police action, resulting in the accident shown in this photograph.


For the other story, it is police who are at fault, idly standing by, and whose actions are provocations of resistance. It is the police who do not respond appropriately.

Each narrative is supported to some extent by this photograph; in both stories, what is happening is unacceptable. The difference lies with who is being blamed for what is shown: the authorities, or those protesting, resisting. The choice of one story or another is informative about the biases and which narrative (one that supports the status quo, or one that challenges it) is being embraced by the image's interpreter. That this picture appears to come from the instant that the man is run over, the driver's lack of response may not mean much: without more information we cannot say what happened before or after from this image alone, which is what makes it such a useful mirror for locating and recognizing the bias of its examiners and interpreters.

Being an instant of time, it cannot answer if the man was run over intentionally, threw himself under the motorcycle, or what was happening; never the less, it has the potential to become an iconic representation of what happened during the Occupy Wall Street protests...






 
 

 
 
  • more from theory: CRITICAL OBSERVATIONS

  •  
     
  • print

  •