PORTFOLIO |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Glitch Procedures in Helios | Divine (2013)
story © Michael Betancourt | published December 3, 2015 | permalink |
|
|
|
|
|
The music video produced for Saeed Alis song of the same title, Helios | Divine is 4 minutes long, organized into four sections of approximately equal length. It is designed to act as a posthuman landscape where what we believe we see is not entirely the same as what is actually visible on screen: a complex network of squares and rectangles that twinkle and contain a continually shifting field of colors that combine into larger blocks only to break into smaller, more discrete units. The imagery presented is emergentwhat can be seen when looking at a still image is radically different than the encounter with the moviebut is also composed from uniform squares of color, an effect of the glitching process that stripped recognizable, high definition imagery from the raw footage. This visual development follows the sequence of imagery common to the revelatory experiences described in the 1930s by German psychologist Heinrich Klver. A summary of his imagery describes the progression of Helios | Divine: in a continuously transforming shot (rather than a series of individual, discrete shots), the initial parting of the veil, becomes by degrees a beautiful landscape, then a figure that merges into a large, circular disk with light rays stretching out, followed by a second, darker landscape.
|
|
read more
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anti-Formalist Glitches
story © Michael Betancourt | published November 26, 2015 | permalink |
|
|
|
|
|
A potential revealation of the materiality of the digital is thus only one part of what the digital glitch might present: the other part is the utter dependence of all these technologies on the human social realm. The particular form of a digital work when rendered for human viewing/encounter makes the purpose of that particular data stream apparent, whether it is a movie, a piece of music, a text or anything else, the data itself is encoded for human purposes. The automatic nature of the digital device is of a different character than the autonomy of agency. The illusion that our devices function without our input, without responding to our desires and demands is a reflection of their design, and the functions these machines are constructed to achievethe superficially mysterious, perfect nature of the digitally manufactured, its magical aura, work to obscure the underlying physical reality of the digital and its subservience to human choices and agency. These foundations are all hidden within the aura of the digital, most especially the dependent relationship between the functioning of the digital technology and the demands made by the desires of human society (and provides its formal basis).
|
|
read more
|
|
|
|
|
|