GLITCHASEMICS by Marco Giovenale

story © Michael Betancourt | published May 23, 2020 | permalink |  |  

story © Michael Betancourt | published March 28, 2018 | permalink |  |  

The journal Utsanga.it has a theoretical essay of mine on defamiliariazation (Brecht’s Verfremdungseffekt) and glitch art (technical failure). Here is an excerpt:

The postcinematic aspects of the Unheimlich glitch cannot be under-emphasized. It is precisely a product of post-digitality violating the established ontological order of cinema—the differentiation between Modernist conceptions of medium-specificity and the convergent break-down of those boundaries by computer technology—coupled with the expansion of its dispositive by the emergent identifications of ambivalent meaning posed by a metastable articulation. The specifically Unheimlich (uncanny) dimensions of digital materiality for cinematic ontology (as demonstrated by the glitch) resides in displacements of established lexical expertise that become apparent in defamiliarization. It is not mere materiality, but its role in interpretation that is essential. Connections to the formal medium masks the ideological and lexical dimensions of post-digital challenges, effectively emphasizing materiality to the exclusion of both critical and normative modes’ adaptation to immanence and maintenance of familiar order.

read more

story © Michael Betancourt | published February 12, 2018 | permalink |  |  

“Cinema” has always been linked to Modernist aesthetics: the definitions of commercial film, the avant-garde film, and video art as autonomous, independent and entirely separate from each other argues against their contextual influences and the hybrid crossings between them. The historical organization of “cinema” as a serious art form in the 1960s and 1970s linked the earlier selections of “great films” to an explicitly Modernist conception of motion pictures as an essentially realist, narrative form whose connections to the American art critic Clement Greenberg’s teleological “purity” was revealed by the parallel articulation of the “structural film” in the avant-garde cinema by P. Adams Sitney. This Modernist heritage shapes the debates over “postcinema,” a reflected in the “great films” re-used as foundational axioms. This conception of “cinema” makes the contemporary challenge by digital technology emergent in “postcinema” inevitable as this model requires a denial of the convergences created by computer technology.

read more

story © Michael Betancourt | published July 25, 2017 | permalink |  |  

The convergence of immaterial digital processes and the physical world is an increasingly obvious part of everyday experience, and has been steadily getting more attention since the start of the twenty-first century. There is nothing new about this relationship, which has been developing since at least the 1980s, but what is of interest is how these developments have stopped being “new” and simply become a part of everyday reality, accepted and largely ignored as just an aura of the digital. The variety of terms attempting to name these developments reveals the different approaches and concerns of the people introducing them: as challenge, as celebration, as philosophical shift.

read more

story © Michael Betancourt | published July 24, 2017 | permalink |  |  

I recently read my copy of Vendela Grundell's book, Flow And Friction: On The Tactical Potential Of Interfacing With Glitch Art and was pleasantly surprised to see my critical framework for considering 'glitch art' being applied to a new area, web design. I would be interested to see her analysis applied to media works as well, rather than just publications, but I can see the importance of art history working with web media. I am glad to see more work being done on the convergence of glitch processes and tactical media.